254 APPENDIX TO CHAPTER IX continuity to U x [0,1], By (Ap.2.5), we are thus reduced to proving the theorem for the mapping /: ( -> frt. It is clear that for n — 0, / is inessen- tial. Suppose n ^ 0, and let us prove by contradiction that / cannot be inessential. Otherwise, there would exist a nonconstant continuous mapping A of U into R such that ฃ" = eih(O in U. As /z(U) is a compact (3.17.9) and connected ((9.5.8) and (3.19.7)) subset of R, /z(U) is a compact interval [a, b] with a9 where e > 0 is sufficiently small. By (9.5.5), /z(C) - (a - a) is a multiple of 27t, and the choice of V implies that this multiple can only be 0 as soon as e < n; but this contradicts the definition of a. (Ap.2.9) The identity mapping ฃ-+ฃof\J onto itself is essential. 3. CUTS OF THE PLANE In a metric space E, we say a subset A of E separates two points x, y of E — A if the connected components (Section 3.19) of x and y in E — A are distinct. We say that A cuts E (or is a cut of E) if E — A is not connected. For any two points a, b of C such that a ^ b, let sa> b(z) be the function z -* (z — d)\(z — b), defined in C — {b}; it is readily verified that sttj b is a homeomorphism of C — {b} onto C — {!}. (Ap.3.1) (Eilenberg's criterion) Let H be a compact subset of C; in order that H separate two distinct points a,bofC~H,a necessary and suf- ficient condition is that the mapping z -> s&t b(z)/\sai b(z)\ 0/H into U be essential. (a) Sufficiency. Suppose a and b are in the same connected component A of C — H. As C - H is open in C and C is locally connected ((3.19.1) and (3.20.16)), A is open in C (3.19.5). By (9.7.2) there is a path t->y(t) in A, defined in I = [0, 1], such that y(0) = a, y(l) = b. As y(t) $ H for any value of t, the mapping (z, t)-*f(z, f) =* sa>m(z)l\sa>y(t)(z)\ is continuous in H x I, and f(z, 0) = 1, /(z, 1) = sa b(z)/\sa b(z)\\ the result follows from (Ap.2.5). (b) Necessity. Let A be the connected component of C — H which contains a; A is open in C and all its frontier points are in H (they cannot re s not a pole